Star Trek: Prodigy - Season 1 Review, Part 1

This week on Sci-Fi Adventures, I'm writing about the first three episodes of the first ever 3D animated Star Trek series, Star Trek: Prodigy! Well, maybe they're actually just two episodes, as it starts off with a double length story. Either way, what you're getting here is:

• 1-01 - Lost and Found (1)
  
• 1-02 - Lost and Found (2)
• 1-03 - Starstruck

Star Trek is far from the first sci-fi franchise to get a kiddified animated spin-off (RoboCop got two of them!), though Prodigy seems to be more of a Star Wars: The Clone Wars than a Stargate: Infinity, as it's apparently considered to be in-continuity. That means if they blow up someone's homeworld in it, it has to be blown up in all the serious grown-up live-action series too, that's just how it works. Prodigy's also far from the first Trek cartoon, though it does something the other series have been avoiding until now: it stars a crew of literal children. This is a very different approach to the one Star Trek: The Animated Series took, as the series deliberately avoided putting kids on the ship, trusting that young viewers would be able to latch onto the adult heroes just fine. I have to admit, it's not exactly filling me with hope and enthusiasm, but I'm trying to keep an open mind.

Okay, there'll be SPOILERS here for the two/three episodes and probably some earlier Trek series as well (like Discovery), but I'm going to act like I don't know a thing about what happens next. Because I actually wrote these reviews right after watching the episodes for the first time and I genuinely had no clue where it was going.

Babylon 5 5-15: Darkness Ascending

Episode:

103

|

Writer:

J. Michael Straczynski

|

Director:

Janet Greek

|

Air Date:

03-Jun-1998

---

This week on Sci-Fi Adventures I'm watching Babylon 5 season 5 episode 15: Darkness Ascending. A bit of a miserable title for this one. Also most of the time the series puts its episode titles over an establishing shot of the station, but twice this season they've put it over one of the characters instead and both times it's been Garibaldi. So there's some immensely pointless trivia for you.

The episode was directed by Janet Greek, which is a name that showed up a lot in seasons one and two, especially at the start of the most important episodes, but then disappeared entirely for seasons three and four. This is her third episode this season though and she'll be back for two more stories before it's all over.

Warning: I'll be recapping, screencapping, reacting to and commenting on this entire episode, so there will be SPOILERS below. There may also be spoilers for earlier episodes too. There will not be spoilers for later ones.

Battlestar Galactica (2004): Miniseries, Part 3

This week on Sci-Fi Adventures, I've nearly finished writing about the 2003 Battlestar Galactica miniseries. This article has three parts and you're looking at the last of them. If you want to go back to PART ONE or PART TWO just click the appropriate text. Speaking of appropriate text, I was a bit surprised that they kept the original 1978 Battlestar Galactica logo for their gritty serious reimagining. I suppose that would've been one of the few things it had in common with the other attempts to bring the series back.

Original star Richard Hatch had been trying to get a proper continuation of the classic series going and in 1998 he filmed a 30 minute pilot movie called The Second Coming to pitch his concept to Universal and show it off to sci-fi conventions. The conventions apparently loved it, but Universal wasn't interested. Then a few years later Bryan Singer and Tom DeSanto began work on another reboot idea that made it as far as pre-production. The 9/11 attacks along with Singer's commitments to the movie X2: X-Men United jammed a stick through that project's spokes. It was going to be a co-production with Fox and when it failed they decided to go with another sci-fi series instead... called Firefly.

So fans could have gotten a continuation of the original Battlestar Galactica story, it was actually in development, but instead they got a brand new story that used the basic premise as a starting point. I can see why this series was a little bit divisive at the time.

There will be SPOILERS here for BSG '78: Saga of a Star World and this BSG Miniseries. I'll won't talk about the later episodes, though I might mention at some point that the series has a controversial ending. I won't say what happens, just that it's controversial.

Battlestar Galactica (2004): Miniseries, Part 2

Hi! This week on Sci-Fi Adventures, I'm still working my way through the epic reimagined Battlestar Galactica miniseries. It's only got two parts but they're really long parts so I haven't quite finished the first one yet. I mean it's three hours long, so that's basically four regular episodes when you think about it.

Just to make things confusing this article has three parts and you're on part two. (If you want to go back to PART ONE just click the text).

Here's some trivia about the Battlestar Galactica reimagining: it was maybe the most expensive show that Sci Fi (later renamed Syfy) had produced, and it was the third most watched program on the channel. The first half got 3.9 million viewers and the second got 4.5 million, which put it roughly where Star Trek: Enterprise was at the time. For comparison, the original Battlestar Galactica movie, Saga of Star World, got an estimated 65 million viewers back in 1978. But it aired on ABC so it had a bit of an advantage there.

Alright, there will be SPOILERS for BSG '78: Saga of a Star World and this BSG Miniseries that I am currently writing about. I'll not say a thing about what happens next however.

Battlestar Galactica (2004): Miniseries, Part 1

Writer:

Ronald D. Moore

|

Director:

Michael Rymer

|

Air Date:

08-Dec-2003

---

This week on Sci-Fi Adventures, I'm watching the two-part Battlestar Galactica remake miniseries. The parts are sometimes called Night One and Night Two but on my DVD they were edited together to form one 3 hour movie. Wait, 3 hours? I struggle enough writing about 90 minute movies! This is going to absolutely destroy me.

Okay, okay, I can do this, I'll just split it into three parts covering an hour each, it'll be fine. Oh by the way, I've called it 'Battlestar Galactica (2004)' up there, because that's the year the actual TV series started airing, and that's what everyone calls it. Even though this actually came out at the end of 2003.

The miniseries was directed by Michael Rymer, who I don't actually know much about. He'd just done that Queen of the Damned movie apparently (which was a sequel to Interview with the Vampire). Writer Ronald D. Moore, on the other hand, is a much more familiar name to me. His writing career began when he joined Star Trek: The Next Generation in season 3, then he wrote a couple of Trek movies and moved on to Deep Space Nine. It was all going well until he joined Star Trek: Voyager, which was a series about a group of people trapped together on a spaceship with limited resources on a long journey to a shining planet called Earth. Basically, he didn't get on with the way his former friend Brannon Braga was running things and he quit after two episodes, taking with him a whole lot of ideas on how the series could've been improved.

Four years later he got another chance to tell a story about a starship crew on a journey, only this time he was in the captain's seat, and this is what we got. It's a more naturalistic and grounded series designed to appeal to viewers who'd gotten tired of cheesy Star Trek space adventures with reset buttons and Starfleet protocols, but didn't want Farscape's goofy characters or Firefly's playful dialogue.

This BSG is also a reimagining of a series from 1978 and seeing as I just watched the pilot movie, Saga of a Star World, I figured I might as well compare the two as I go. This means that there will be a few SPOILERS for Saga of a Star World mixed in with a ridiculous amount of spoilers for this miniseries. Seriously, I'll be going through it scene by scene. I'll not spoil a thing about what happens later though. In fact I won't even drop cheeky hints, because screw cheeky hints.